In the immortal words of Barney Stinson, "Challenge accepted."
For those of you looking for a more typical post from me, which often involves more of the "Suburban Dad" in the title than the "Sports," I apologize. For those of you who don't know who Barney Stinson is, I apologize. For those of you confused about all of this, stick with me, all shall be revealed.*
Everyone knows that Condoleezza Rice is the most powerful woman in America. Love her or hate her (and who can really hate her), you have to admire her accomplishments and her abilities. Many don't know (and some, gasp! don't care) that she is a member, the only female member I might add, of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee ("the Committee").
The Committee is a group of people tasked by...well, I don't even know who tasked them...tasked by someone related to college football to name the four teams that will play for the college football national championship. The Committee was created because people were unsatisfied with the previous method of naming a national champion, which was created because people were unsatisfied with the previous method of naming a national champion, which was created because people were unsatisfied with the previous method of naming a national champion. I am not making this up. I also promise that I will not give any more history of this...ever.
The biggest piece of evidence that Condi...can I call you Condi? Thanks...is the most powerful woman in America is that she was selected as one of the first two female members at Augusta National. The second biggest is that she is the only female member of the Committee. Of course what good is great power if you can't use it, or perhaps, even abuse it. I think this deserves a closer look.
The most powerful organization in college football is not the NCAA, is not the Southeast Conference and is not, yet at least, Condi. The most powerful organization in college football is the University of Notre Dame. This is the school that has its own network contract. This is the school with more Heisman Trophy winners than any other. This is the school all conferences wanted, the school The Big Ten courted for years, The Big East accepted a "friends with benefits" relationship with just to be affiliated with it, and the school the ACC accepted a slightly better "friends with benefits" relationship with in the hopes that one day Notre Dame will accept the engagement ring offered so many times before. Notre Dame moves the needle and the dollar signs, so Notre Dame must be appeased.
How do you appease Notre Dame if they refuse to play by the same rules as everyone else, even when the entire country is in the midst of a major conference gobbling session? The threat of being left out is no threat at all, thanks to the ACC giving ND a promise ring and dangling the engagement ring in front of the school to be accepted at any time. You have to keep ND in the system another way. Otherwise, the biggest money-maker, by far, is gone and the whole system is threatened. Chaos would ensue. Like Bill Murray said in Ghostbusters, "Dogs and cats living together!" College football needs ND in the system, so college football needs to give them more than everyone else. Under the old system, they had an easier path to the big bowls. Under the new system, they have Condi.
The new system was, theoretically at least, created to make things more fair for everyone. The "little guy" (Boise St., Utah before they joined the PAC-12, etc.) would have a chance to play for the national title. This is, however, big time college football, so we know that isn't true. The trick was to give ND an advantage, but not make it obvious.
How do we do this? We put someone on the Committee who everyone loves (we went through that above), has a connection to ND (earned a Masters there) but not too close a connection (Bachelors and Doctorate earned at University of Denver), who has a connection to another "power conference" school (works at Stanford) that is not a threat (Stanford is always close, but never really a national title contender), is super powerful (member at Augusta - that is the ultimate in power), whose integrity won't be questioned (she's a woman, the only woman, on a college football committee - if anyone is accused of improper behavior she is the last one who will be suspected) and who has some experience in diplomatically convincing others to see things her way (ummm...perhaps a former Secretary of State.) Then tell her to get ND in the playoff. Easy enough...so far.
The problem once you get this far is that you have to deal with a committee. Thirteen people were selected for the committee, and although Condi is the perfect person for the ND conspiracy, some of these people are going to cause trouble. Looking at the members of the Committee, one name immediately jumps out at you: Archie Manning.
Archie is a problem for several reasons. First, it is even more difficult to hate Archie...Can I call you Archie? Thanks... than it is to hate Condi. Second, Archie is football royalty. He had a Hall of Fame college career, and a very successful pro career. Well, statistically a very successful pro career. He engenders great sympathy, though, because he was the quarterback for the woebegone New Orleans Saints. This makes him loveable and admired. He played well, despite being on a terrible team. Third, he is the pater familias of the first family of quarterbacks, siring Peyton, arguably the greatest QB ever, and Eli (once known as "our hero") a two time Super Bowl winner. Fourth, he is firmly rooted in the SEC, having played for an SEC school and sending both his quarterbacking sons to SEC schools. The SEC is a problem, as we will see later. Archie is the person in the room most likely to challenge Condi for the highest combination of respect, admirability, likeability and unnoticed influence over others. He will have to be dealt with.
Condi had several options with Archie. She could have tried to sway him, but Archie seems like his own man and has too many ties to the SEC. That was too big a risk. She could have tried to oppose him with a full frontal assault, but that could show her hand, and the key to the ND conspiracy is secrecy. By taking Archie on directly, others in the room may have started to question Condi's motives. That could blow the whole thing up. So, Archie had to go. Condi went for removal. We can't be sure if she threatened him, hurt him, put Dick Cheney on him or what. Regardless, Archie took leave and is gone.
That leaves 12 members of the Committee left. Obviously, Condi can't oust everyone from the Committee. Archie had to go, but eventually, things would start to look like an Agatha Christie novel, so Condi is going to have to use that diplomacy thing mentioned before. However, it is worth looking at what other moves could (or should) be made.
Jeff Long, the Chair of the Committee, would be a clear candidate for removal. As the Chair, he already wields slightly more power than the rest, and he is the Athletic Director at the University of Arkansas. Arkansas is in the SEC. The SEC is the biggest obstacle to ND's inclusion in the college football playoff, because the SEC, either by reputation or deservedly so, is the most powerful conference in college football. As things currently stand, the SEC has two teams in position to make the playoff (Miss. St. and Auburn), as well as the #5 team (Alabama). The SEC is going to push for two teams in the playoff, so decreasing their influence is a necessity. Unfortunately, ousting Long would look a little too suspicious. If two SEC based members of the Committee, including the Chair, had to leave because they "had a accident", I think people may start to wonder. Condi is smarter than me, so she would have come to the same conclusion. Long is safe.
Condi should be able to easily build a coalition of five people. Tyrone Willingham is a former ND and Stanford coach. He will do whatever Condi says. Lt. Gen. Mike Gould is retired military. Condi can reminisce with him about their warmongering days together and curry his favor. Tom Osborne is a well known conservative crackpot. Dick Cheney will tell him to do whatever Condi wants. He is also from the University of Nebraska, which is a Big Ten school. The Big Ten has no real chance of getting in the playoff this year, so better to curry favor with the Queen of the Committee now and hope to get some payback when (if) the Big Ten ever has a chance in the future. Barry Alvarez played at Nebraska, coached at Nebraska and coached at ND before taking over at Wisconsin, another Big Ten school. He'll fall in line with Osborne.
There are others even the great power of Condi will not be able to sway. Pat Haden (USC) and Dan Radakovich (Clemson) will do everything they can to keep a PAC-12 and ACC school in the playoff, including sell their souls to each other and the SEC. Steve Weiberg is a former reporter. Everyone knows about the liberal media bias and reporters' hatred of Bush and his administration. He will do everything in his power to spite Condi. Mike Tranghese is the former Commissioner of the Big East. The Big East fell apart, in large part due to football. If ND had stuck with the Big East, and joined in football along with all other sports, perhaps the Big East would be thriving as an all sports conference today. But no, the Irish would never commit, and they joined the mass exit with Louisville, Syracuse, etc., joining the ACC of all horrors. I think it is safe to say that Tranghese is no fan of ND.
That leaves things at 5-5, with Tom Jernstedt and Oliver Luck left. Jernstedt is a former NCAA executive vice president. Consistent with the priorities of the NCAA he'll do whatever makes the most money. ND=money, so he is likely to go with Condi.
Oliver Luck. Played at West Virginia. Current Athletic Director at West Virginia. Father of Andrew Luck, the successor to Peyton Manning with the Indianapolis Colts. Oliver Luck. Successful college QB. Father of a potential Hall of Fame QB. I am noticing a trend here. Seems a little too easy, a little too convenient. I'm not saying anything, but if I was Oliver...Can I call you Oliver? Thanks...I wouldn't be taking any "private" meetings with Condi...or accepting that friendly cup of coffee at the beginning of the next Committee meeting.
After two weeks of the College Football Playoff Ranking, Notre Dame is 10th. Clearly, offing Archie didn't do the trick. Condi got some work to do, and if I was Oliver Luck, I'd be watching my back.
*This post was requested by one of my most loyal readers. In the spirit of my church, which had a requested sermon topic given two weeks ago, I decided to give it a shot. Challenge offered, challenge accepted. I hope you enjoyed this little exercise, even if you are not a college football fan. And if anything seems amiss, just remember, everything is a conspiracy. So says Oliver Stone, so says I. Oliver...interesting.
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Thursday, October 23, 2014
And then 20 Years Later...
I am the youngest of 13 cousins on my mother's side. I have not spent a great deal of time with most of my cousins, due in part to age and in part to geography. Many of my cousins lived in Rhode Island for most of their young lives, while I spent the first 5 years of mine travelling the world as a Navy Brat, and the next 37 years rooted in Virginia, simply being a brat.
My most vivid memories of spending time with my cousins were at various weddings. As the youngest of 13, extending in age over at least 15 years, I started attending these weddings around the age of 10. Eventually, I became fairly popular, because I turned 16 and had a driver's license. Then my cousins enjoyed me as the designated driver, from weddings to after parties and then home. I didn't really mind being the designated driver at 16 or 17, because my parents were always around, so its not like I was going to be boozing it up at the wedding anyway. I got some great stories spending time with my older and somewhat less sober cousins, and their increasing number of spouses and significant others. This time period was perfect, because they were getting married and having fun, but not yet having children.
I can't say I received many pearls of wisdom during this time period. Most of the talk was humorous and drunken. However, one comment from a "cousin-in-law" when I was about 17 years has always stuck in my mind. I was probably entering my senior year of high school, so my cousins were interested in where I was planning to go to college. Most of them were finished with school, so I think they enjoyed seeing me in the joys of high school and I imagine I made some comments about looking forward to finishing high school and heading to college. It was then that my "cousin-in-law" said, "High school felt like it took 8 years, college felt like 6 months."
I don't know why that comment stuck with me. Probably because I didn't believe it at the time, and I can't say I feel like it is true. My high school experience was generally good, so I didn't feel like it dragged on too much and college didn't blow right by me. Maybe college felt like it lasted longer because I did three years of law school and didn't exactly stop living like a college kid for three more years. Regardless, I have always remembered the comment, but never put much stock in it.
And then 20 years later...
I attended my 20th reunion Homecoming at The College of William and Mary this past weekend. I have no idea how 20 years have passed. College may not have felt like 6 months, but the last 20 years certainly have not felt like 20 years. To think I have spent more of my life after college than I spent before college is a bit surreal.
I don't, however, want this to turn into a whiney, "Where did the time go?" look at the last 20 years. Or the last 42 for that matter. I enjoyed my 20th reunion Homecoming, and would rather remember the good times from this past weekend, and from 20 years ago.
The first thing I noticed was that the difference between college kids and recent graduates is indistinguishable to people like me. Many people, myself included, had buttons with their graduating year on them. These were quite helpful. However, it was a little disturbing to see a very young looking person wearing an '08 button. The fact that that person (who am I kidding? Those people) have been out of college for 6 years is almost as scary as the fact that I have been out for 20.
The second thing I noticed was that a lot of people from my class, and my era, were not there. I know we missed three soccer practices, one (two day) swim meet, three soccer games, a school party/fund-raiser and a campout to attend Homecoming this year. I imagine many other people were in the same situation and decided to miss Homecoming, rather than 20 other events for the kids. The Wife and I were glad for the break and happy that we didn't have to figure out how to manage all of the events that were planned for this past weekend.
The advantage of going to Homecoming for my 20th reunion is that many of the people there had children the same, or close to the same, age as mine. All three boys had a great time playing with new friends. They likely won't see these new friends again for several years, if ever, but for this weekend, it was fun to see the children of my friends become my children's friends.
Ultimately, though, it was great to see people I haven't seen in the last 6 months to 20 years. I admit I was a little apprehensive about Homecoming. Would I be nostalgic? Would it be weird? Would I realize that the people I was friends with in college have changed, or I have changed, and we don't have anything in common, or we just don't like each other anymore? I don't mean that as a bad thing. People change as they grow older and sometimes they just don't click like they used to. I saw that happen during four years of high school and four years of college. It is not a big jump to say that over 20 years, some of the people who were my friends just aren't my friends anymore.
What I learned was that the people I truly enjoyed 20 years ago, I still enjoy today. Maybe it is the shared experience of four years. I had two major influences on me in college: the swim team and my fraternity. I had close friends in both organizations, not one of whom overlapped. I enjoyed seeing friends from both. The people I really liked in college, I still really like today. The people who weren't that important then, still aren't today. Twenty years may have passed, but I apparently like the same people now as I did then.
Shortly after I graduated, I remember thinking about what I missed most. It was the closeness. My best friend lived in the same room as me. Other good friends were a walk down the hall, or a short trip across campus. People went to the same parties and the same delis (bars). Swimming friends were at swim practice, swim meets and swim events. No one was difficult to find or see or hang out with. After college, people went their own ways. Some of my closest friends lived with me, but others lived on the other side of the city, or the other side of the country. It wasn't as easy to find them, see them or hang out. When kids and family activities entered the picture, it became even harder. And to be honest, I don't try enough.
Maybe that is why I enjoyed this past weekend so much. For just a couple days, I had the closeness back. I ran into the same people in several different places, because we all went back to our old hang-outs. When trying to meet up with friends, no one was ever more than a few minutes away. Sure, kids and family and obligations got in the way a little, but it was easier to deal with because of the closeness. Everyone was easy to find, easy to see and easy to hang out with.
I won't be going back anytime soon. Kids activities and family obligations make it difficult at this point in my life. But the next time, most likely in 5 years, I won't be apprehensive. I am looking forward to going and I hope to see the same people, and perhaps a few more.
I try to keep things fairly anonymous in this blog. I won't mention anyone by name. Those of you who I enjoyed seeing and spending time with...you know who you are. Thank you. It was great to see you and re-live the old days for a short period.
My most vivid memories of spending time with my cousins were at various weddings. As the youngest of 13, extending in age over at least 15 years, I started attending these weddings around the age of 10. Eventually, I became fairly popular, because I turned 16 and had a driver's license. Then my cousins enjoyed me as the designated driver, from weddings to after parties and then home. I didn't really mind being the designated driver at 16 or 17, because my parents were always around, so its not like I was going to be boozing it up at the wedding anyway. I got some great stories spending time with my older and somewhat less sober cousins, and their increasing number of spouses and significant others. This time period was perfect, because they were getting married and having fun, but not yet having children.
I can't say I received many pearls of wisdom during this time period. Most of the talk was humorous and drunken. However, one comment from a "cousin-in-law" when I was about 17 years has always stuck in my mind. I was probably entering my senior year of high school, so my cousins were interested in where I was planning to go to college. Most of them were finished with school, so I think they enjoyed seeing me in the joys of high school and I imagine I made some comments about looking forward to finishing high school and heading to college. It was then that my "cousin-in-law" said, "High school felt like it took 8 years, college felt like 6 months."
I don't know why that comment stuck with me. Probably because I didn't believe it at the time, and I can't say I feel like it is true. My high school experience was generally good, so I didn't feel like it dragged on too much and college didn't blow right by me. Maybe college felt like it lasted longer because I did three years of law school and didn't exactly stop living like a college kid for three more years. Regardless, I have always remembered the comment, but never put much stock in it.
And then 20 years later...
I attended my 20th reunion Homecoming at The College of William and Mary this past weekend. I have no idea how 20 years have passed. College may not have felt like 6 months, but the last 20 years certainly have not felt like 20 years. To think I have spent more of my life after college than I spent before college is a bit surreal.
I don't, however, want this to turn into a whiney, "Where did the time go?" look at the last 20 years. Or the last 42 for that matter. I enjoyed my 20th reunion Homecoming, and would rather remember the good times from this past weekend, and from 20 years ago.
The first thing I noticed was that the difference between college kids and recent graduates is indistinguishable to people like me. Many people, myself included, had buttons with their graduating year on them. These were quite helpful. However, it was a little disturbing to see a very young looking person wearing an '08 button. The fact that that person (who am I kidding? Those people) have been out of college for 6 years is almost as scary as the fact that I have been out for 20.
The second thing I noticed was that a lot of people from my class, and my era, were not there. I know we missed three soccer practices, one (two day) swim meet, three soccer games, a school party/fund-raiser and a campout to attend Homecoming this year. I imagine many other people were in the same situation and decided to miss Homecoming, rather than 20 other events for the kids. The Wife and I were glad for the break and happy that we didn't have to figure out how to manage all of the events that were planned for this past weekend.
The advantage of going to Homecoming for my 20th reunion is that many of the people there had children the same, or close to the same, age as mine. All three boys had a great time playing with new friends. They likely won't see these new friends again for several years, if ever, but for this weekend, it was fun to see the children of my friends become my children's friends.
Ultimately, though, it was great to see people I haven't seen in the last 6 months to 20 years. I admit I was a little apprehensive about Homecoming. Would I be nostalgic? Would it be weird? Would I realize that the people I was friends with in college have changed, or I have changed, and we don't have anything in common, or we just don't like each other anymore? I don't mean that as a bad thing. People change as they grow older and sometimes they just don't click like they used to. I saw that happen during four years of high school and four years of college. It is not a big jump to say that over 20 years, some of the people who were my friends just aren't my friends anymore.
What I learned was that the people I truly enjoyed 20 years ago, I still enjoy today. Maybe it is the shared experience of four years. I had two major influences on me in college: the swim team and my fraternity. I had close friends in both organizations, not one of whom overlapped. I enjoyed seeing friends from both. The people I really liked in college, I still really like today. The people who weren't that important then, still aren't today. Twenty years may have passed, but I apparently like the same people now as I did then.
Shortly after I graduated, I remember thinking about what I missed most. It was the closeness. My best friend lived in the same room as me. Other good friends were a walk down the hall, or a short trip across campus. People went to the same parties and the same delis (bars). Swimming friends were at swim practice, swim meets and swim events. No one was difficult to find or see or hang out with. After college, people went their own ways. Some of my closest friends lived with me, but others lived on the other side of the city, or the other side of the country. It wasn't as easy to find them, see them or hang out. When kids and family activities entered the picture, it became even harder. And to be honest, I don't try enough.
Maybe that is why I enjoyed this past weekend so much. For just a couple days, I had the closeness back. I ran into the same people in several different places, because we all went back to our old hang-outs. When trying to meet up with friends, no one was ever more than a few minutes away. Sure, kids and family and obligations got in the way a little, but it was easier to deal with because of the closeness. Everyone was easy to find, easy to see and easy to hang out with.
I won't be going back anytime soon. Kids activities and family obligations make it difficult at this point in my life. But the next time, most likely in 5 years, I won't be apprehensive. I am looking forward to going and I hope to see the same people, and perhaps a few more.
I try to keep things fairly anonymous in this blog. I won't mention anyone by name. Those of you who I enjoyed seeing and spending time with...you know who you are. Thank you. It was great to see you and re-live the old days for a short period.
Friday, September 12, 2014
Not a Role Model
In 1992, Hall of Fame basketball player Charles Barkley and Nike released a controversial commercial which started with Barkley saying into the camera "I am not a role model." The commercial was controversial, because athletes are role models whether they want to be or not. However, Barkley was making a point that the people criticizing the commercial either missed (which I doubt) or ignored (more likely). He shouldn't be a role model. This point is made clear by the last line in the commercial, "Just because I dunk a basketball, doesn't mean I should raise your kids."
I thought of this commercial in the midst of the Ray Rice/NFL scandal. In case anyone reading this doesn't know what I am talking about, Ray Rice is an NFL running back who knocked his fiancée out with a left hook to the face in an elevator in Atlantic City. He then dragged her body partially out of the elevator, like a caveman. He also kind of kick-pushed her body with his foot, to move it around a little. Hard as it may be to believe, the video of this scene is more disturbing than my brief description.
The NFL took five months to punish him and gave him a 2 game suspension. The NFL was widely criticized for the leniency of the punishment and reacted by creating a "domestic abuse" policy. Under the NFL's new "domestic abuse" policy, a player is suspended for 6 games after the first incident, and banned after a second incident. Rice was exempt from this policy, because he had already been "punished" for his actions.
Two months after Rice was "punished" a new video from the elevator, showing Rice punching his fiancée, was released. Prior to this, the only video available was outside the elevator, showing Rice dragging her lifeless body and giving her the aforementioned kick-push. The new video showed the punch. The NFL reacted by re-opening his case and banning him from the NFL. The Ravens cut him. His fiancée criticized the media for messing with their lives to create "ratings". Roger Goodell, the Commissioner of the NFL, began spin control, rather unsuccessfully, I might add.
In the last two days, it is clear that the NFL as an organization, and Goodell specifically, handled this poorly. That is the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is that the NFL willfully ignored all the evidence to give Rice a short suspension then lied through their teeth when the second video was released and are now trying to make this all go away with a phony investigation by a former FBI Director who works for a law firm that does a lot of business with the NFL. I have read and heard multiple calls for Goodell to resign or be fired.
I do not plan to go too deep into the Ray Rice situation or Roger Goodell's job. I have discussed this a few times with The Wife and ultimately called it a minefield. I prefer not to misstep and blow up. I have no job to lose and no reputation to tarnish, but I don't find this situation easy or straight forward. This is a mess. I gave the background, because the situation raises a number of interesting questions related to sports, athletes and kids.
In the midst of this whirlwind, the Baltimore Ravens, Ray Rice's former team, played a nationally televised Thursday night game on the NFL network. You really can't make this stuff up. The stories from that game this morning included coverage of the games and coverage of the number of fans wearing Ray Rice jerseys in the stands. According to reports I read, some of the fans are conflicted, some support the Ravens and many support Rice. The fans wearing the Rice jerseys were not limited to men, many women supported Rice as well. When I say support, I don't mean they think he didn't do it or that he was right, but that he didn't deserve to be cut or banned from the league. That the punishment from the NFL was too much.
This is where Charles Barkley comes into the picture. "I am not a role model." I love Barkley and I loved that commercial when it came out. It seemed so simple. Athletes are athletes. They are physical freaks who can do things very few people in the world can do. A professional offensive lineman is a 320 pound (or more) boulder that can run faster than you. A professional basketball player is a 6' 10" wall of muscle who has more coordination than your average ballerina and can jump into the ceiling. An Olympic swimmer can move faster in the water than many people can move on land. (OK, maybe that one is exaggerated a bit). However, outside the game arena, they are people, and some of them aren't very nice people or good people.
Sports are a distraction. At this point, they are a multi-billion dollar industry as well, but their purpose for the average person (fan) is to provide entertainment. Fans don't (usually) cheer for particular athletes because they are good people. They cheer for particular athletes because they are good athletes, usually from their favorite team. They don't stop cheering because someone does something wrong. They stop cheering when the athlete changes uniforms. It may be uncomfortable, but it is a fact.
If you ask me who my favorite athlete is, I am not sure what I would say. If you ask me who my top 10 favorite athletes over the last 25 years have been, I would include Lance Armstrong and Michael Irvin on that list. Lance Armstrong is one of the most disgraced athletes of the last half century. Michael Irvin was a cocaine sniffing, prostitute chasing, fur wearing blowhard. I loved them both. I still have a framed picture of Irvin hanging in my study. Why? Because I never admired Irvin for his character, I admired him for his ability to get open, catch the ball and score touchdowns. I read fairly early in Armstrong's career that he was a complete ass-hole. That was long before the lies and drug use were confirmed, even by him. However, he gave me 7 years of joy, dominating the Tour de France. Some of the things he did on his bike were complete ass-hole moves (staring at Jan Ullrich before dropping him on L'Alpe d'Huez, for example), but I even enjoyed those. Why? Because I admired Armstrong the bike rider, not Armstrong the person.
Armstrong is an interesting case because he did a great deal of good, but he also very clearly demonstrates Barkley's point. You have no idea what athletes are really like. Middle loves LeBron James. From most of what I have heard, LeBron is good guy, a family man and has no skeletons in his closet. However, I have heard one local Washington reporter who says the public persona is all fake and LeBron is a big jerk. I have no idea what he is really like. I make sure not to say really good things or really bad things about LeBron to Middle and I have tried to make Middle understand that he can admire LeBron the basketball player and not worry about LeBron the person.
Of course, this is nearly impossible to do, both for the athlete and the person. Barkley was right, just because he can dunk a basketball, doesn't mean he should raise my kids. However, he was wrong. Athletes are role models. They are role models to children who want to be athletes, or who want to be rich, or who want to imagine a life better than what they have right now. As Ryan Bingham, played by George Clooney, said in Up In the Air, "kids love [athletes] because they follow their dreams." Athletes are role models, because they are living a dream. Children are always going to look up to that.
I realize this a rather unsatisfying conclusion. Athletes shouldn't be role models, but they are. Even the ones who you think are good role models (Ray Rice was seen as one of the good guys according to most articles before this incident), have the potential to fall hard and crush a child's love. There is no good answer. In an ideal world, world class athletic ability would come with impeccable character. Unfortunately, we live in the real world, where the exact opposite is sometimes true. Maybe for a parent, that is the only lesson you can hope your children learn. Or maybe it is time for Barkley to instill some more wisdom on us.
I thought of this commercial in the midst of the Ray Rice/NFL scandal. In case anyone reading this doesn't know what I am talking about, Ray Rice is an NFL running back who knocked his fiancée out with a left hook to the face in an elevator in Atlantic City. He then dragged her body partially out of the elevator, like a caveman. He also kind of kick-pushed her body with his foot, to move it around a little. Hard as it may be to believe, the video of this scene is more disturbing than my brief description.
The NFL took five months to punish him and gave him a 2 game suspension. The NFL was widely criticized for the leniency of the punishment and reacted by creating a "domestic abuse" policy. Under the NFL's new "domestic abuse" policy, a player is suspended for 6 games after the first incident, and banned after a second incident. Rice was exempt from this policy, because he had already been "punished" for his actions.
Two months after Rice was "punished" a new video from the elevator, showing Rice punching his fiancée, was released. Prior to this, the only video available was outside the elevator, showing Rice dragging her lifeless body and giving her the aforementioned kick-push. The new video showed the punch. The NFL reacted by re-opening his case and banning him from the NFL. The Ravens cut him. His fiancée criticized the media for messing with their lives to create "ratings". Roger Goodell, the Commissioner of the NFL, began spin control, rather unsuccessfully, I might add.
In the last two days, it is clear that the NFL as an organization, and Goodell specifically, handled this poorly. That is the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is that the NFL willfully ignored all the evidence to give Rice a short suspension then lied through their teeth when the second video was released and are now trying to make this all go away with a phony investigation by a former FBI Director who works for a law firm that does a lot of business with the NFL. I have read and heard multiple calls for Goodell to resign or be fired.
I do not plan to go too deep into the Ray Rice situation or Roger Goodell's job. I have discussed this a few times with The Wife and ultimately called it a minefield. I prefer not to misstep and blow up. I have no job to lose and no reputation to tarnish, but I don't find this situation easy or straight forward. This is a mess. I gave the background, because the situation raises a number of interesting questions related to sports, athletes and kids.
In the midst of this whirlwind, the Baltimore Ravens, Ray Rice's former team, played a nationally televised Thursday night game on the NFL network. You really can't make this stuff up. The stories from that game this morning included coverage of the games and coverage of the number of fans wearing Ray Rice jerseys in the stands. According to reports I read, some of the fans are conflicted, some support the Ravens and many support Rice. The fans wearing the Rice jerseys were not limited to men, many women supported Rice as well. When I say support, I don't mean they think he didn't do it or that he was right, but that he didn't deserve to be cut or banned from the league. That the punishment from the NFL was too much.
This is where Charles Barkley comes into the picture. "I am not a role model." I love Barkley and I loved that commercial when it came out. It seemed so simple. Athletes are athletes. They are physical freaks who can do things very few people in the world can do. A professional offensive lineman is a 320 pound (or more) boulder that can run faster than you. A professional basketball player is a 6' 10" wall of muscle who has more coordination than your average ballerina and can jump into the ceiling. An Olympic swimmer can move faster in the water than many people can move on land. (OK, maybe that one is exaggerated a bit). However, outside the game arena, they are people, and some of them aren't very nice people or good people.
Sports are a distraction. At this point, they are a multi-billion dollar industry as well, but their purpose for the average person (fan) is to provide entertainment. Fans don't (usually) cheer for particular athletes because they are good people. They cheer for particular athletes because they are good athletes, usually from their favorite team. They don't stop cheering because someone does something wrong. They stop cheering when the athlete changes uniforms. It may be uncomfortable, but it is a fact.
If you ask me who my favorite athlete is, I am not sure what I would say. If you ask me who my top 10 favorite athletes over the last 25 years have been, I would include Lance Armstrong and Michael Irvin on that list. Lance Armstrong is one of the most disgraced athletes of the last half century. Michael Irvin was a cocaine sniffing, prostitute chasing, fur wearing blowhard. I loved them both. I still have a framed picture of Irvin hanging in my study. Why? Because I never admired Irvin for his character, I admired him for his ability to get open, catch the ball and score touchdowns. I read fairly early in Armstrong's career that he was a complete ass-hole. That was long before the lies and drug use were confirmed, even by him. However, he gave me 7 years of joy, dominating the Tour de France. Some of the things he did on his bike were complete ass-hole moves (staring at Jan Ullrich before dropping him on L'Alpe d'Huez, for example), but I even enjoyed those. Why? Because I admired Armstrong the bike rider, not Armstrong the person.
Armstrong is an interesting case because he did a great deal of good, but he also very clearly demonstrates Barkley's point. You have no idea what athletes are really like. Middle loves LeBron James. From most of what I have heard, LeBron is good guy, a family man and has no skeletons in his closet. However, I have heard one local Washington reporter who says the public persona is all fake and LeBron is a big jerk. I have no idea what he is really like. I make sure not to say really good things or really bad things about LeBron to Middle and I have tried to make Middle understand that he can admire LeBron the basketball player and not worry about LeBron the person.
Of course, this is nearly impossible to do, both for the athlete and the person. Barkley was right, just because he can dunk a basketball, doesn't mean he should raise my kids. However, he was wrong. Athletes are role models. They are role models to children who want to be athletes, or who want to be rich, or who want to imagine a life better than what they have right now. As Ryan Bingham, played by George Clooney, said in Up In the Air, "kids love [athletes] because they follow their dreams." Athletes are role models, because they are living a dream. Children are always going to look up to that.
I realize this a rather unsatisfying conclusion. Athletes shouldn't be role models, but they are. Even the ones who you think are good role models (Ray Rice was seen as one of the good guys according to most articles before this incident), have the potential to fall hard and crush a child's love. There is no good answer. In an ideal world, world class athletic ability would come with impeccable character. Unfortunately, we live in the real world, where the exact opposite is sometimes true. Maybe for a parent, that is the only lesson you can hope your children learn. Or maybe it is time for Barkley to instill some more wisdom on us.
Monday, August 18, 2014
Ice Bucket Challenge
What in the world does dumping a bucket of ice water over your head have to do with ALS?
Absolutely nothing. But at the same time, a whole heck of a lot.
Like just about everyone else in America who has ever joined and occasionally visited a social media website, I have watched many people dump buckets of ice water over their heads in the last couple of weeks. Initially, I watched with passing interest...there's so and so from my fraternity... there's whatshisname who I swam with...there's whoseewasit from high school...hey look, they are now having their kids do it. I started to see some celebrities do it, most notably LeBron. LeBron is notable, because Middle loves him more than he loves his own mother. While going through YouTube on the TV to show Middle LeBron's ice bucket dump, I found the top 10 celebrity ice bucket challenges. The best, by far, is Paul Bissonette, who was doused by glacier water on top of a mountain.
The ice bucket challenge has taken America by storm. Well, at least in social media. A Google search for "celebrity ice bucket challenge" yields 54,200,000 results. The top results are traditional news sources, such as USA Today and Time, entertainment news sources, such as Entertainment Tonight and internet news sights, such as BuzzFeed. Celebrities who have participated include politicians, such as Chris Christie, numerous athletes (LeBron, Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning and Christiano Ronaldo, just to name a few), actors, singers, the 1% (Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg), groups, teams, cheerleaders, news anchors (Matt Lauer), media moguls (Oprah Winfrey) and just about every level of celebrity from A to Z. This is in addition to the many friends and family of just about everyone. My 8 year old niece did hers yesterday, although her older brother missed the water dump, so she had to do it twice. O4C posted a news article on FaceBook that appears to say Lithuanians are doing it, although I can't be sure, because the article was in Lithuanian.
The methods are as diverse as the people doing the challenge. Many go for the solo dump. Just as many have someone do it for them. I enjoyed the William and Mary volleyball team, who had the water dumped on them, as a group huddled together, from a landing, 20 feet up. Watching multiple people do it to each other all at once is entertaining. I have seen people do it in pools, at the beach, fully clothed, mostly naked, on a boat, sitting and standing. I have seen complete misses, near misses and direct hits. Chris Carter missed his head and hit Chris Berman. I guess you could call that collateral damage, if Berman wasn't already wet, because he knows how to dump a bucket of water over his own head without missing. I guess that's why Carter was a receiver and not a quarterback. The best, Paul Bissonette, was mentioned above.
As I slowly watched this phenomenon I noticed that it seemed to be stalking me, like a tiger, sneaking up on a zebra. Slowly but surely, the people who were doing the challenge were moving from people I knew 20 years ago, to people I know now, to people I see on a fairly regular basis, to close friends. The closer that wave gets to you, the more likely you are to get wet.
Add to this, the desperation of Middle to participate. All day Sunday he kept asking questions about the ice bucket challenge. "Dad, do you want to do the ice bucket challenge?" "Dad, do you want me to do the ice bucket challenge?" "Who wants to see me dump a bucket of ice over my head?" "How cold do you think the water is?" "Do you want to nominate me for the ice bucket challenge?" Will you nominate me for the ice bucket challenge?" "How do you get nominated?" "When do you want me to do it?"
I got to the point that I almost, and I stress the word "almost", wanted to get challenged, just so I could make Middle do it to. Middle was so persistent and desperate, Youngest also wants to do the challenge. Eldest has reached the point where he realizes dumping a bucket of cold water over your head might not be that much fun. He wants nothing to do with it.
So, it was with mild trepidation, but a little relief, that I saw a FaceBook notice yesterday afternoon, a day I knew my oldest and dearest friend was fulfilling her challenge. Sure enough, I had been challenged, which at least means that Middle gets to dump a bucket of ice water over his head.
On SportsCenter this morning, I saw a report on the beginning of the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. The report stated that this trend began with a former Boston College baseball player named Pete Frates. Frates has been diagnosed with ALS and is currently confined to a wheelchair. Frates is credited with creating the challenge, along with friend and fellow ALS patient, Pat Quinn. The purpose of the challenge is to raise awareness and money to support research into ALS and hopefully find a cure.
Today, on FaceBook, I saw an article from Slate.com, criticizing the Challenge, and those participating. The main point of the article is that people are spending money on ice, rather than on ALS research. The writer proposes that people should not buy ice, they should not fill a bucket with water and the ice and they should just give money. The writer presumes that the people participating in the challenge are doing it simply to show off and do not care in any way about ALS or people suffering from ALS. The article criticizes the ice bucket videos for not giving any substantive information about ALS, why the money is needed or what it will do. Of course, the author fails to give any of this information himself, while suggesting that people give money and not make a video.
The irony of this article is that the evidence to destroy the writers point is in the article itself. The ALS Association raised $1.35 million in the two weeks before the article was written, as compared to $22,000.00 during the same period last year. Read that again. It sounds to me like a lot of people are donating their "hard-earned cash" money, as well as time to make videos and gather FaceBook "likes". The ALS Association website, http://alsa.org/, currently advertises the challenge prominently. Perhaps this writer should recognize that a disease like ALS, as well as any other charitable organization, needs all the publicity it can get and that a social media craze is going to raise awareness in ways that the organization couldn't do in 10 years without blowing almost every dollar they collect. It is obvious that many more people are giving to ALSA this year than ever and the reason is this challenge. Sure, many of them may not be giving money, but donations are breaking records. Why complain? Especially when you consider that almost all of the people dumping ice water over their heads weren't going to give to ALS this year and probably didn't deduct $5.00 from their donation to cover the cost of ice. Not that I think most of them bought the ice anyway.
ALS is a devastating disease. Getting funding for ALS must be difficult, because there are no success stories. You can't point to someone who lived, or even fought the good fight. People get it, they get worse and then they die. There is no cure. There is no treatment. Cancer has success stories. Breast cancer has fun bumper stickers (SAVE THE TA-TAS). MS is debilitating, but not fatal. There are tons of diseases out there making people suffer and killing people. There are tons of organizations trying to find cures or treatments, or simply make life a little better for the people suffering and their families. They are all fighting for money, often the same money. Raising awareness means getting the word out that money is needed. The people suffering from this disease don't care if donors know what the disease does or why the money is needed. They only care if a cure is going to be found. They don't care how or why. They don't care why anyone donated, only that they donated.
With this in mind, today, I will accept the challenge. I will dump a bucket of ice water over my head, with Middle and Youngest by my side. I will also donate to ALS and another charity. It is the least I can do.
Oh, and thanks, Laura.
Absolutely nothing. But at the same time, a whole heck of a lot.
Like just about everyone else in America who has ever joined and occasionally visited a social media website, I have watched many people dump buckets of ice water over their heads in the last couple of weeks. Initially, I watched with passing interest...there's so and so from my fraternity... there's whatshisname who I swam with...there's whoseewasit from high school...hey look, they are now having their kids do it. I started to see some celebrities do it, most notably LeBron. LeBron is notable, because Middle loves him more than he loves his own mother. While going through YouTube on the TV to show Middle LeBron's ice bucket dump, I found the top 10 celebrity ice bucket challenges. The best, by far, is Paul Bissonette, who was doused by glacier water on top of a mountain.
The ice bucket challenge has taken America by storm. Well, at least in social media. A Google search for "celebrity ice bucket challenge" yields 54,200,000 results. The top results are traditional news sources, such as USA Today and Time, entertainment news sources, such as Entertainment Tonight and internet news sights, such as BuzzFeed. Celebrities who have participated include politicians, such as Chris Christie, numerous athletes (LeBron, Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning and Christiano Ronaldo, just to name a few), actors, singers, the 1% (Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg), groups, teams, cheerleaders, news anchors (Matt Lauer), media moguls (Oprah Winfrey) and just about every level of celebrity from A to Z. This is in addition to the many friends and family of just about everyone. My 8 year old niece did hers yesterday, although her older brother missed the water dump, so she had to do it twice. O4C posted a news article on FaceBook that appears to say Lithuanians are doing it, although I can't be sure, because the article was in Lithuanian.
The methods are as diverse as the people doing the challenge. Many go for the solo dump. Just as many have someone do it for them. I enjoyed the William and Mary volleyball team, who had the water dumped on them, as a group huddled together, from a landing, 20 feet up. Watching multiple people do it to each other all at once is entertaining. I have seen people do it in pools, at the beach, fully clothed, mostly naked, on a boat, sitting and standing. I have seen complete misses, near misses and direct hits. Chris Carter missed his head and hit Chris Berman. I guess you could call that collateral damage, if Berman wasn't already wet, because he knows how to dump a bucket of water over his own head without missing. I guess that's why Carter was a receiver and not a quarterback. The best, Paul Bissonette, was mentioned above.
As I slowly watched this phenomenon I noticed that it seemed to be stalking me, like a tiger, sneaking up on a zebra. Slowly but surely, the people who were doing the challenge were moving from people I knew 20 years ago, to people I know now, to people I see on a fairly regular basis, to close friends. The closer that wave gets to you, the more likely you are to get wet.
Add to this, the desperation of Middle to participate. All day Sunday he kept asking questions about the ice bucket challenge. "Dad, do you want to do the ice bucket challenge?" "Dad, do you want me to do the ice bucket challenge?" "Who wants to see me dump a bucket of ice over my head?" "How cold do you think the water is?" "Do you want to nominate me for the ice bucket challenge?" Will you nominate me for the ice bucket challenge?" "How do you get nominated?" "When do you want me to do it?"
I got to the point that I almost, and I stress the word "almost", wanted to get challenged, just so I could make Middle do it to. Middle was so persistent and desperate, Youngest also wants to do the challenge. Eldest has reached the point where he realizes dumping a bucket of cold water over your head might not be that much fun. He wants nothing to do with it.
So, it was with mild trepidation, but a little relief, that I saw a FaceBook notice yesterday afternoon, a day I knew my oldest and dearest friend was fulfilling her challenge. Sure enough, I had been challenged, which at least means that Middle gets to dump a bucket of ice water over his head.
On SportsCenter this morning, I saw a report on the beginning of the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. The report stated that this trend began with a former Boston College baseball player named Pete Frates. Frates has been diagnosed with ALS and is currently confined to a wheelchair. Frates is credited with creating the challenge, along with friend and fellow ALS patient, Pat Quinn. The purpose of the challenge is to raise awareness and money to support research into ALS and hopefully find a cure.
Today, on FaceBook, I saw an article from Slate.com, criticizing the Challenge, and those participating. The main point of the article is that people are spending money on ice, rather than on ALS research. The writer proposes that people should not buy ice, they should not fill a bucket with water and the ice and they should just give money. The writer presumes that the people participating in the challenge are doing it simply to show off and do not care in any way about ALS or people suffering from ALS. The article criticizes the ice bucket videos for not giving any substantive information about ALS, why the money is needed or what it will do. Of course, the author fails to give any of this information himself, while suggesting that people give money and not make a video.
The irony of this article is that the evidence to destroy the writers point is in the article itself. The ALS Association raised $1.35 million in the two weeks before the article was written, as compared to $22,000.00 during the same period last year. Read that again. It sounds to me like a lot of people are donating their "hard-earned cash" money, as well as time to make videos and gather FaceBook "likes". The ALS Association website, http://alsa.org/, currently advertises the challenge prominently. Perhaps this writer should recognize that a disease like ALS, as well as any other charitable organization, needs all the publicity it can get and that a social media craze is going to raise awareness in ways that the organization couldn't do in 10 years without blowing almost every dollar they collect. It is obvious that many more people are giving to ALSA this year than ever and the reason is this challenge. Sure, many of them may not be giving money, but donations are breaking records. Why complain? Especially when you consider that almost all of the people dumping ice water over their heads weren't going to give to ALS this year and probably didn't deduct $5.00 from their donation to cover the cost of ice. Not that I think most of them bought the ice anyway.
ALS is a devastating disease. Getting funding for ALS must be difficult, because there are no success stories. You can't point to someone who lived, or even fought the good fight. People get it, they get worse and then they die. There is no cure. There is no treatment. Cancer has success stories. Breast cancer has fun bumper stickers (SAVE THE TA-TAS). MS is debilitating, but not fatal. There are tons of diseases out there making people suffer and killing people. There are tons of organizations trying to find cures or treatments, or simply make life a little better for the people suffering and their families. They are all fighting for money, often the same money. Raising awareness means getting the word out that money is needed. The people suffering from this disease don't care if donors know what the disease does or why the money is needed. They only care if a cure is going to be found. They don't care how or why. They don't care why anyone donated, only that they donated.
With this in mind, today, I will accept the challenge. I will dump a bucket of ice water over my head, with Middle and Youngest by my side. I will also donate to ALS and another charity. It is the least I can do.
Oh, and thanks, Laura.
Friday, August 8, 2014
Kill the Family Tour 2014 - Part 2
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
I apologize for resorting to a cliché, but given the name of our summer this year, it seemed appropriate. Sam Seaborn, the fictional speechwriter on the television show, The West Wing played by Rob Lowe, once said, "Good writers borrow from other writers, great writers outright steal from them." Or something to that effect. I know not whether I am a good writer, a great writer or just a writer. I do borrow things from others, and from time to time I suppose I could be accused of stealing. One could argue I borrowed from the great philosopher, Yoda, with the beginning of that last sentence. For this post, I will be borrowing quotes and at least one cliché, not necessarily from great writers, but from whatever has inspired me the last couple of days.
So, to begin again:
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
Despite the title, Kill the Family Tour 2014, we did not kill the family. We did not even kill one member of the family. The closest we came was after the Tour split into subset tours, Kill the Lithuanian (and Mom) and Rest the Boys, when Middle toppled off his bed and landed in the emergency room. This injury was unrelated to the Tour, but it did occur before the official end, so we will claim it. At various times during the summer Youngest seemed on the verge of either completely breaking down or taking out another family member in a homicidal rage brought on by sleep deprivation; Eldest looked like the walking dead; Middle seemed determined to prove he has stamina that exceeds that of a truly great Tour de France rider; and O4C looked like she just might regret taking this on, but we survived.
We did not kill the family. We made it stronger.
There were various risks with our summer experiment this year. First and foremost, The Wife was the only person who met O4C, and that was about 14 years ago. We had no idea if she was qualified for the position of "summer nanny" or, even if qualified, she had any idea what she was getting herself into. Babysitting is one thing. A full time job, babysitting our three boys, all day, every weekday, is a somewhat different experience. In addition, we had had great experiences with our "summer nannies" the last two summers, experiences which most likely could have been repeated. So, we were passing up a very good thing.
Second, and most importantly, O4C was going to be living in our home. This was not just an "employee". We were adding a family member. If this didn't work out, on a professional or personal level, we would have been in trouble. From her side of things, if she didn't like us, or the boys, or the job, or America, she was stuck in a miserable situation for six weeks. I have limited experience with teenage girls, but after this summer, I at least have some. I can tell you, I have no desire to spend six weeks stuck in a house with a miserable teenage girl. This would be its own special level of Hell I am certain even Dante couldn't imagine.
However, as they say, "nothing ventured, nothing gained." We took on these risks and were rewarded with a bigger, stronger family. Despite several joking comments to the contrary, I did not gain a daughter this summer. As I have said in a previous post, she was more like a niece to The Wife and I. We didn't have to "parent" her. We had a fantastic summer. We grew our family by one. The boys gained a sister. O4C gained three brothers.
The image of this is shown in two pictures, both on a bench outside Baskin Robbins. The first was taken on O4C's first Saturday night in America. All four of them sat on that bench next to each other and smiled. The picture looks orderly. Youngest is making a goofy face, but otherwise, it is four people, enjoying ice cream, on a bench. The second picture was taken on O4C's last Friday night in America. They are on the exact same bench. However, this picture is not orderly. They are climbing all over each other. They are a mess. In the first picture, they took up the whole bench, with noticeable space between each person. In the second picture, the boys are on O4C like they are climbing a mountain, and they barely used half the bench. No need for space, they needed to be close. As O4C's Lithuanian Mother put it, "Time flies...love grows." O4C posted this second picture on Facebook with the comment, "Be jealous. I have the best brothers in the world."
Sometimes it makes me sad, though... Andy being gone. I have to remind myself that some birds aren't meant to be caged. Their feathers are just too bright. And when they fly away, the part of you that knows it was a sin to lock them up DOES rejoice. But still, the place you live in is that much more drab and empty that they're gone. I guess I just miss my friend. - The Shawshank Redemption
Yes, this is melodramatic, and does not perfectly apply. O4C was not caged in our house and we did not rejoice at her flying away. However, this quote found itself in my head the night she left.
I have always loved the movie, The Shawshank Redemption, and this quote in particular. It's the last sentence that gets me. "I guess I just miss my friend." I imagine Red trying to justify his feelings. Andy didn't belong in prison. It was a sin to lock him up. His feathers are too bright. Ultimately, though, Red confronts his true thought, his true feelings. He misses his friend. There are no philosophical justifications, just pure human emotion. One person missing another.
We can do the same thing with our family. O4C needed to go back to her home, to her family, to her friends. We definitely needed a break from the pace we were holding all summer. We need sleep, we need normalcy. The Boys need to go back to school in a few weeks. The house needs to be cleaned badly. However, I think this quote found its way into my head for one simple reason. We just miss her. We can try to justify things any way we want. We can't get away from the human emotion.
And just like that, she was gone. - Forrest Gump
Again, not exactly perfect. Jenny kept coming into Forrest's life, then leaving suddenly. We knew when O4C was leaving even before she arrived. However, it feels sudden because it all happened so fast. Summer is a whirlwind anyway, but you add a new family member and 6 weeks worth of extra activities, and it flies by even quicker. Her last day with us, she and The Wife returned from New York, she packed, we ate dinner, several people cried, and she left. Just like that, she was gone.
Before O4C left, we asked the Boys if they wanted her to come back. Eldest, who was the most excited to meet her and bonded with her the quickest, immediately said "yes". Middle responded with a fairly nonchalant "yes", as only Middle can. Youngest defiantly said "no" and maintained his position. As she and The Wife drove off to the airport, Youngest started to freak out. He was yelling at me, "I didn't want her to go!" I think he demonstrated the suddenness of her leaving. She was always there, and then, just like that, she was gone. Up to that point, it didn't feel real to any of us. She had become a permanent member of the family. And just like that, she was gone.
The next night, I went to the basement to play Wii. O4C lived in the basement during her time with us and, in a most likely over-sensitive effort to not invade the personal space of a 16 year old girl, I spent very little time there. After she left, I looked forward to some mindless Mario time. I put the boys to bed and headed down to play. As I walked through the basement, the large purple suitcase that had been sitting next to the bed for 6 weeks was gone. Her tablet was not sitting on the table. The bed was made, and nothing was on top of it. The basement felt empty.
I played that night, but with a very heavy heart. The basement felt incomplete. Our family feels incomplete. In a way, our lives feel incomplete.
Last night, after walking past the bathroom and ignoring the towels hanging there for two days, I finally took them to the laundry room to be washed. This was my symbolic acceptance that she's gone. As long as those towels hung in the basement, part of her was still here. Just like Youngest, "I didn't want her to go."
Using movie quotes in this post is fitting, because our summer was much like the plot of a summer comedy movie. What happens when you thrust a 16 year old girl into a family of boys for the summer? Introduction, build up, adventure, hijinks and a good-bye. Of course, the movie ends. There is no next day. There are no towels to be washed. The suitcase doesn't disappear.
Sometimes, it makes me sad. I have to remind myself, we lived our movie. We are better and stronger for it. We are a family of six now. We not only gained a new family member for us, I feel like we gained a new family. The Wife was able to reconnect with an old friend. Hopefully, we will have a lifetime of trips to spend with O4C and her family. We did what we set out to do. All of our children had a wonderful summer. Part me rejoices at an overwhelmingly successful experiment...I guess I just miss my daughter.
I apologize for resorting to a cliché, but given the name of our summer this year, it seemed appropriate. Sam Seaborn, the fictional speechwriter on the television show, The West Wing played by Rob Lowe, once said, "Good writers borrow from other writers, great writers outright steal from them." Or something to that effect. I know not whether I am a good writer, a great writer or just a writer. I do borrow things from others, and from time to time I suppose I could be accused of stealing. One could argue I borrowed from the great philosopher, Yoda, with the beginning of that last sentence. For this post, I will be borrowing quotes and at least one cliché, not necessarily from great writers, but from whatever has inspired me the last couple of days.
So, to begin again:
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
Despite the title, Kill the Family Tour 2014, we did not kill the family. We did not even kill one member of the family. The closest we came was after the Tour split into subset tours, Kill the Lithuanian (and Mom) and Rest the Boys, when Middle toppled off his bed and landed in the emergency room. This injury was unrelated to the Tour, but it did occur before the official end, so we will claim it. At various times during the summer Youngest seemed on the verge of either completely breaking down or taking out another family member in a homicidal rage brought on by sleep deprivation; Eldest looked like the walking dead; Middle seemed determined to prove he has stamina that exceeds that of a truly great Tour de France rider; and O4C looked like she just might regret taking this on, but we survived.
We did not kill the family. We made it stronger.
There were various risks with our summer experiment this year. First and foremost, The Wife was the only person who met O4C, and that was about 14 years ago. We had no idea if she was qualified for the position of "summer nanny" or, even if qualified, she had any idea what she was getting herself into. Babysitting is one thing. A full time job, babysitting our three boys, all day, every weekday, is a somewhat different experience. In addition, we had had great experiences with our "summer nannies" the last two summers, experiences which most likely could have been repeated. So, we were passing up a very good thing.
Second, and most importantly, O4C was going to be living in our home. This was not just an "employee". We were adding a family member. If this didn't work out, on a professional or personal level, we would have been in trouble. From her side of things, if she didn't like us, or the boys, or the job, or America, she was stuck in a miserable situation for six weeks. I have limited experience with teenage girls, but after this summer, I at least have some. I can tell you, I have no desire to spend six weeks stuck in a house with a miserable teenage girl. This would be its own special level of Hell I am certain even Dante couldn't imagine.
However, as they say, "nothing ventured, nothing gained." We took on these risks and were rewarded with a bigger, stronger family. Despite several joking comments to the contrary, I did not gain a daughter this summer. As I have said in a previous post, she was more like a niece to The Wife and I. We didn't have to "parent" her. We had a fantastic summer. We grew our family by one. The boys gained a sister. O4C gained three brothers.
The image of this is shown in two pictures, both on a bench outside Baskin Robbins. The first was taken on O4C's first Saturday night in America. All four of them sat on that bench next to each other and smiled. The picture looks orderly. Youngest is making a goofy face, but otherwise, it is four people, enjoying ice cream, on a bench. The second picture was taken on O4C's last Friday night in America. They are on the exact same bench. However, this picture is not orderly. They are climbing all over each other. They are a mess. In the first picture, they took up the whole bench, with noticeable space between each person. In the second picture, the boys are on O4C like they are climbing a mountain, and they barely used half the bench. No need for space, they needed to be close. As O4C's Lithuanian Mother put it, "Time flies...love grows." O4C posted this second picture on Facebook with the comment, "Be jealous. I have the best brothers in the world."
Sometimes it makes me sad, though... Andy being gone. I have to remind myself that some birds aren't meant to be caged. Their feathers are just too bright. And when they fly away, the part of you that knows it was a sin to lock them up DOES rejoice. But still, the place you live in is that much more drab and empty that they're gone. I guess I just miss my friend. - The Shawshank Redemption
Yes, this is melodramatic, and does not perfectly apply. O4C was not caged in our house and we did not rejoice at her flying away. However, this quote found itself in my head the night she left.
I have always loved the movie, The Shawshank Redemption, and this quote in particular. It's the last sentence that gets me. "I guess I just miss my friend." I imagine Red trying to justify his feelings. Andy didn't belong in prison. It was a sin to lock him up. His feathers are too bright. Ultimately, though, Red confronts his true thought, his true feelings. He misses his friend. There are no philosophical justifications, just pure human emotion. One person missing another.
We can do the same thing with our family. O4C needed to go back to her home, to her family, to her friends. We definitely needed a break from the pace we were holding all summer. We need sleep, we need normalcy. The Boys need to go back to school in a few weeks. The house needs to be cleaned badly. However, I think this quote found its way into my head for one simple reason. We just miss her. We can try to justify things any way we want. We can't get away from the human emotion.
And just like that, she was gone. - Forrest Gump
Again, not exactly perfect. Jenny kept coming into Forrest's life, then leaving suddenly. We knew when O4C was leaving even before she arrived. However, it feels sudden because it all happened so fast. Summer is a whirlwind anyway, but you add a new family member and 6 weeks worth of extra activities, and it flies by even quicker. Her last day with us, she and The Wife returned from New York, she packed, we ate dinner, several people cried, and she left. Just like that, she was gone.
Before O4C left, we asked the Boys if they wanted her to come back. Eldest, who was the most excited to meet her and bonded with her the quickest, immediately said "yes". Middle responded with a fairly nonchalant "yes", as only Middle can. Youngest defiantly said "no" and maintained his position. As she and The Wife drove off to the airport, Youngest started to freak out. He was yelling at me, "I didn't want her to go!" I think he demonstrated the suddenness of her leaving. She was always there, and then, just like that, she was gone. Up to that point, it didn't feel real to any of us. She had become a permanent member of the family. And just like that, she was gone.
The next night, I went to the basement to play Wii. O4C lived in the basement during her time with us and, in a most likely over-sensitive effort to not invade the personal space of a 16 year old girl, I spent very little time there. After she left, I looked forward to some mindless Mario time. I put the boys to bed and headed down to play. As I walked through the basement, the large purple suitcase that had been sitting next to the bed for 6 weeks was gone. Her tablet was not sitting on the table. The bed was made, and nothing was on top of it. The basement felt empty.
I played that night, but with a very heavy heart. The basement felt incomplete. Our family feels incomplete. In a way, our lives feel incomplete.
Last night, after walking past the bathroom and ignoring the towels hanging there for two days, I finally took them to the laundry room to be washed. This was my symbolic acceptance that she's gone. As long as those towels hung in the basement, part of her was still here. Just like Youngest, "I didn't want her to go."
Using movie quotes in this post is fitting, because our summer was much like the plot of a summer comedy movie. What happens when you thrust a 16 year old girl into a family of boys for the summer? Introduction, build up, adventure, hijinks and a good-bye. Of course, the movie ends. There is no next day. There are no towels to be washed. The suitcase doesn't disappear.
Sometimes, it makes me sad. I have to remind myself, we lived our movie. We are better and stronger for it. We are a family of six now. We not only gained a new family member for us, I feel like we gained a new family. The Wife was able to reconnect with an old friend. Hopefully, we will have a lifetime of trips to spend with O4C and her family. We did what we set out to do. All of our children had a wonderful summer. Part me rejoices at an overwhelmingly successful experiment...I guess I just miss my daughter.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Kill the Family Tour 2014 - Part 1
What do you get when you try to fit two years of tourist activities into six weeks while maintaining a normal life schedule? Kill the Family Tour 2014.
I started calling this summer Kill the Family Tour 2014 on our way home from Philadelphia several weeks ago, when three of our four children were passed out in the car, and the fourth was fighting it, because not being tired and not sleeping in the car is his "thing". I realized then that we were killing them, and we had barely started.
For those who haven't regularly read this blog (all but about 5 people), didn't get to follow the Kill the Family Tour 2014 on Facebook or don't have some other way of knowing what in the world I am talking about, I will start from the beginning.
Last year, we invited The Wife's God-Daughter from Lithuania to visit us for the 2014 summer, watch the boys, and see America. I came up with this idea because my parents did the same thing for a few of my cousins when I was a mere boy. My boys don't have any cousins of the right age, so we thought of The Wife's God-Daughter. She very enthusiastically accepted, bought a plane ticket and flew from Lithuania to Dulles, VA, by herself at the age of 16, just in time for school to end. Of course, due to the plethora of snow that fell on the DC Metropolitan area, school didn't end for another five days. That was fine, because she was able to ease her way into the summer.
Well, maybe not exactly "ease her way into the summer". She landed at about 4:00 on a Friday afternoon. After introductions to the family and a pizza dinner, she was awakened at 6 am to go to a swim meet, on a grey, drizzly day. In a way, this was the best introduction. The summer was going to be a whirlwind tour of swim meets, Chantilly teenagers, other kids, and whatever we could do between periodic bouts of passing out.
Notwithstanding the above, we did ease into the Kill the Family Tour. We started Sunday afternoon by playing mini-golf. Lithuania has no mini-golf courses, so this was Our 4th Child's (O4C) first introduction to mini-golf, or as I called it that day, "silly things Americans do to pass the time." She took right to it, finishing second in the family and scoring one hole-in-one, something an unnamed amateur blogger failed to do that day. I did, of course, win the game, though.
From mini-golf, we took off running. I won't go into everything, because I don't want to bore you too much, and I seriously doubt I remember everything, but we had some highlights. We tried to hit some of the big things you can do with a family of 4, in the mid-Atlantic area, while maintaining an insane summer swim schedule and not getting on an airplane. Our goal was to kill the family, and show O4C some of America.
O4C had three things she was told to do in America, go to a Starbucks (she did that several times), go to a library (hit that the first week), and go to the top of the tallest building in the city. Those Lithuanians certainly are a wild and crazy bunch. For our second weekend, we decided to go for the tallest building in the city. After a family birthday lunch for my sister-in-law, during which Middle kept running outside to watch the Mexico-Netherlands World Cup game, we headed to downtown DC and the Washington Monument.
That failed, miserably. To get tickets to go up the Washington Monument, you have to pick them up that morning, apparently at about 7 am. We were not going to go to DC at 7 am, ever, so we had to give up on the tallest building. We did get to see some of the Mall and Smithsonian, though.
The next weekend was the 4th of July, and we went crazy. On the 4th, we went to the National Zoo. We went very early, which was awesome. No crowds, anywhere, including at the pandas. We rode the merry-go-round, went to 5 Guys for dinner and showed O4C an American fireworks display, which she enjoyed thoroughly. The next day, we had a family dinner, because O4C, who was becoming our daughter by this time, had to meet the whole family. She did go shopping away from crazy boys for a while that day as well. Sunday, we went to Philadelphia to see the Liberty Bell, Constitution Hall and a Duck Boat Tour. The family was beginning to fade.
Keep in mind, by this point, O4C had also attended five swim meets. In 17 days. I was fairly certain she thought we were crazy. She would have been right, but we hadn't even reached the peak point of the swim season.
In the next few weeks we hit DC again for monuments, Skyline Drive, Luray Caverns, Baltimore, Annapolis and probably some other stuff I can't remember. We also hit hell week for swimming, 4 meets in 7 days, and 8 meets in 17 days, plus a talent show, a movie night, a trip to Kings Dominion (just for O4C), and at least 34 other things I have forgotten by now. We even introduced O4C to the joys of a hibachi Japanese steakhouse.
We take our families to tourism destinations to give them some culture, some education, hopefully some fun and some memories. Ironically, it seems the closer we live to something, the less likely we are to visit. I have lived in the DC Metropolitan area for 37 years. I rarely go into DC. After seeing my pictures from the Tour's trip to Philadelphia, a friend commented that we saw more of Philly in one day than he has in 40 years living there. Everyday life has a tendency to sap the energy for doing tourist things out of normal days. While on vacation, we go to museums or historical sights or amusement parks. When not on vacation, we go to soccer games and swim meets, and mow the lawn, or just sit, trying to figure out how to garner enough energy to make dinner.
I realize vacations are different, but the last 6 weeks makes me wonder if we aren't missing something. Between the ages of 12 and 30 I saw more of San Francisco, Chicago and New York, than I saw of DC. I have been to San Francisco once in my life; Chicago and New York twice. I have lived here for 37 years. I wouldn't recommend repeating the last 6 weeks to anyone, but perhaps we should take better advantage of what is right next door from time to time, without needing a kick in the ass.
O4C's trip to America was our kick in the ass. Usually, it is Middle, who insists on going to DC every President's Day, a tradition killed by the snow this year, because the boys were at school making up a snow day. We took that kick in the ass and kicked right back. We did everything we planned except go to the beach and go to a baseball game. O4C is going to have to come back for those. Get ready for Kill the Family Tour 2015.
We also re-found social media. Ok, not social media as much as Facebook, the social media taken over by our generation. Shortly before O4C's arrival, The Wife and I both got new phones. We downloaded the Facebook app and became crazy Facebook users. We documented everything from that first mini-golf game to the last hug good-bye. Our initial motivation was for O4C's Lithuanian mother to be able to see what we were doing. (Sorry, but part of her belongs to us now, so, yes, to us you are now Lithuanian Mom, not "real" Mom.) Eventually it became a game to see who could get the most "likes". Once O4C's friends started to get in the action, The Wife and I took great pleasure in getting Lithuanian "likes". We really are a bunch of dorks, aren't we?
Kill the Family Tour 2014 on Facebook also became kind of a show for friends. I had several people tell me they enjoyed following our activities on Facebook. Things became particularly fun when my friends and O4C's friends started commenting to each other. It only happened a few times, but in some weird, small way, I felt like we were bringing the world a little closer. Yeah, I am making too much of this, but it was a special summer. One that none of us will forget.
Kill the Family Tour 2014 officially ended on August 2, 2014, when the family split up for the first time in 6 weeks. The sub-tour, Kill the Lithuanian (and Mom) Tour went to New York for a couple of days. Like the previous 6 weeks, they hit the highlights. Most importantly, The Wife got O4C up a tall building, Empire State. It may not be the tallest building, but I think fame makes up for a few feet. They also learned, much like the Washington Monument, going to the Statue of Liberty requires more pre-planning than they made. Regardless, they had a fantastic time.
Sub-tour, Rest the Boys 2014, went home and ended up in the one place we didn't find during the full Kill the Family Tour...the hospital. Although unrelated to Kill the Family Tour 2014, it was fitting that someone ended up in the ER at some point. Middle whacked his head on the corner of a bedframe and got 5 staples to close up the gap.
O4C and The Wife returned from NYC mere hours before O4C had to go back to Dulles airport, where this adventure started. We had what The Wife and I had been calling "The Last Supper", danced as a family to one last song and said our good-byes. We survived Kill the Family Tour 2014, even with a few tears. But more on that in Part 2.
I started calling this summer Kill the Family Tour 2014 on our way home from Philadelphia several weeks ago, when three of our four children were passed out in the car, and the fourth was fighting it, because not being tired and not sleeping in the car is his "thing". I realized then that we were killing them, and we had barely started.
For those who haven't regularly read this blog (all but about 5 people), didn't get to follow the Kill the Family Tour 2014 on Facebook or don't have some other way of knowing what in the world I am talking about, I will start from the beginning.
Last year, we invited The Wife's God-Daughter from Lithuania to visit us for the 2014 summer, watch the boys, and see America. I came up with this idea because my parents did the same thing for a few of my cousins when I was a mere boy. My boys don't have any cousins of the right age, so we thought of The Wife's God-Daughter. She very enthusiastically accepted, bought a plane ticket and flew from Lithuania to Dulles, VA, by herself at the age of 16, just in time for school to end. Of course, due to the plethora of snow that fell on the DC Metropolitan area, school didn't end for another five days. That was fine, because she was able to ease her way into the summer.
Well, maybe not exactly "ease her way into the summer". She landed at about 4:00 on a Friday afternoon. After introductions to the family and a pizza dinner, she was awakened at 6 am to go to a swim meet, on a grey, drizzly day. In a way, this was the best introduction. The summer was going to be a whirlwind tour of swim meets, Chantilly teenagers, other kids, and whatever we could do between periodic bouts of passing out.
Notwithstanding the above, we did ease into the Kill the Family Tour. We started Sunday afternoon by playing mini-golf. Lithuania has no mini-golf courses, so this was Our 4th Child's (O4C) first introduction to mini-golf, or as I called it that day, "silly things Americans do to pass the time." She took right to it, finishing second in the family and scoring one hole-in-one, something an unnamed amateur blogger failed to do that day. I did, of course, win the game, though.
From mini-golf, we took off running. I won't go into everything, because I don't want to bore you too much, and I seriously doubt I remember everything, but we had some highlights. We tried to hit some of the big things you can do with a family of 4, in the mid-Atlantic area, while maintaining an insane summer swim schedule and not getting on an airplane. Our goal was to kill the family, and show O4C some of America.
O4C had three things she was told to do in America, go to a Starbucks (she did that several times), go to a library (hit that the first week), and go to the top of the tallest building in the city. Those Lithuanians certainly are a wild and crazy bunch. For our second weekend, we decided to go for the tallest building in the city. After a family birthday lunch for my sister-in-law, during which Middle kept running outside to watch the Mexico-Netherlands World Cup game, we headed to downtown DC and the Washington Monument.
That failed, miserably. To get tickets to go up the Washington Monument, you have to pick them up that morning, apparently at about 7 am. We were not going to go to DC at 7 am, ever, so we had to give up on the tallest building. We did get to see some of the Mall and Smithsonian, though.
The next weekend was the 4th of July, and we went crazy. On the 4th, we went to the National Zoo. We went very early, which was awesome. No crowds, anywhere, including at the pandas. We rode the merry-go-round, went to 5 Guys for dinner and showed O4C an American fireworks display, which she enjoyed thoroughly. The next day, we had a family dinner, because O4C, who was becoming our daughter by this time, had to meet the whole family. She did go shopping away from crazy boys for a while that day as well. Sunday, we went to Philadelphia to see the Liberty Bell, Constitution Hall and a Duck Boat Tour. The family was beginning to fade.
Keep in mind, by this point, O4C had also attended five swim meets. In 17 days. I was fairly certain she thought we were crazy. She would have been right, but we hadn't even reached the peak point of the swim season.
In the next few weeks we hit DC again for monuments, Skyline Drive, Luray Caverns, Baltimore, Annapolis and probably some other stuff I can't remember. We also hit hell week for swimming, 4 meets in 7 days, and 8 meets in 17 days, plus a talent show, a movie night, a trip to Kings Dominion (just for O4C), and at least 34 other things I have forgotten by now. We even introduced O4C to the joys of a hibachi Japanese steakhouse.
We take our families to tourism destinations to give them some culture, some education, hopefully some fun and some memories. Ironically, it seems the closer we live to something, the less likely we are to visit. I have lived in the DC Metropolitan area for 37 years. I rarely go into DC. After seeing my pictures from the Tour's trip to Philadelphia, a friend commented that we saw more of Philly in one day than he has in 40 years living there. Everyday life has a tendency to sap the energy for doing tourist things out of normal days. While on vacation, we go to museums or historical sights or amusement parks. When not on vacation, we go to soccer games and swim meets, and mow the lawn, or just sit, trying to figure out how to garner enough energy to make dinner.
I realize vacations are different, but the last 6 weeks makes me wonder if we aren't missing something. Between the ages of 12 and 30 I saw more of San Francisco, Chicago and New York, than I saw of DC. I have been to San Francisco once in my life; Chicago and New York twice. I have lived here for 37 years. I wouldn't recommend repeating the last 6 weeks to anyone, but perhaps we should take better advantage of what is right next door from time to time, without needing a kick in the ass.
O4C's trip to America was our kick in the ass. Usually, it is Middle, who insists on going to DC every President's Day, a tradition killed by the snow this year, because the boys were at school making up a snow day. We took that kick in the ass and kicked right back. We did everything we planned except go to the beach and go to a baseball game. O4C is going to have to come back for those. Get ready for Kill the Family Tour 2015.
We also re-found social media. Ok, not social media as much as Facebook, the social media taken over by our generation. Shortly before O4C's arrival, The Wife and I both got new phones. We downloaded the Facebook app and became crazy Facebook users. We documented everything from that first mini-golf game to the last hug good-bye. Our initial motivation was for O4C's Lithuanian mother to be able to see what we were doing. (Sorry, but part of her belongs to us now, so, yes, to us you are now Lithuanian Mom, not "real" Mom.) Eventually it became a game to see who could get the most "likes". Once O4C's friends started to get in the action, The Wife and I took great pleasure in getting Lithuanian "likes". We really are a bunch of dorks, aren't we?
Kill the Family Tour 2014 on Facebook also became kind of a show for friends. I had several people tell me they enjoyed following our activities on Facebook. Things became particularly fun when my friends and O4C's friends started commenting to each other. It only happened a few times, but in some weird, small way, I felt like we were bringing the world a little closer. Yeah, I am making too much of this, but it was a special summer. One that none of us will forget.
Kill the Family Tour 2014 officially ended on August 2, 2014, when the family split up for the first time in 6 weeks. The sub-tour, Kill the Lithuanian (and Mom) Tour went to New York for a couple of days. Like the previous 6 weeks, they hit the highlights. Most importantly, The Wife got O4C up a tall building, Empire State. It may not be the tallest building, but I think fame makes up for a few feet. They also learned, much like the Washington Monument, going to the Statue of Liberty requires more pre-planning than they made. Regardless, they had a fantastic time.
Sub-tour, Rest the Boys 2014, went home and ended up in the one place we didn't find during the full Kill the Family Tour...the hospital. Although unrelated to Kill the Family Tour 2014, it was fitting that someone ended up in the ER at some point. Middle whacked his head on the corner of a bedframe and got 5 staples to close up the gap.
O4C and The Wife returned from NYC mere hours before O4C had to go back to Dulles airport, where this adventure started. We had what The Wife and I had been calling "The Last Supper", danced as a family to one last song and said our good-byes. We survived Kill the Family Tour 2014, even with a few tears. But more on that in Part 2.
Friday, August 1, 2014
World Cup
I promised a few posts on the World Cup and failed to follow through with any, at least during the competition. I did watch many games, including the finals, but never got around to writing, probably because I am in the midst of Kill the Family Tour 2014 (more on this later). When I am not at a swim meet, or killing the family, I am generally exhausted. Exhaustion makes work hard enough, adding in an unpaid stint as a blogger is just a little too much. However, I am pushing through to give my thoughts in one after the fact post. Hopefully, I can remember most of what I thought over the month of games, because my memory has also been compromised by Kill the Family Tour 2014.
The biggest story coming into the World Cup was preparedness. Would the Brazilians be ready for the Cup and would the people support the games or protest? This seems to be a lather, rinse, repeat story for both the World Cup and the Olympics over the last 10 or so years (potentially more, but memory, fading from age, destroyed by the Tour.) As typically happens, everything came together in time, and, as the Brits would say, the hosts put on a jolly good show.
Let's be honest, the people running these things and broadcasting them know what they are doing. Pick a place with beautiful scenery and point the cameras in the right direction. I know there were some protests, but media coverage was limited. Cameras were pointed at the games, the beautiful scenery, the unbelievable shots (like the floods before the US-Portugal game), the crazy fans, and the hot women. I saw about an equal number of crazy fans and hot women. I don't recall seeing a protest.
I read in the Washington Post a few weeks ago that this may be the last World Cup in a democratic nation. The article stated that people in democratic nations no longer want to spend their tax dollars on new stadiums when they need new schools and food. As support for this premise, the writer pointed out that Poland and Sweden dropped their bids for the 2022 Olympics because the people don't want them. This may have an element of truth to it, but I don't think it will play out. The next two World Cups are not (currently planned to be) in democracies, but somehow, I think the US will host this thing again. I also find it hard to believe that Germany, England, France, Brazil, Japan and/or South Korea will never want to host again. Even in democracies, the people in power find ways to do things the people don't want, especially if that gets their faces on television.
The second biggest story, at least here, was whether the US could advance from the "Group of Death." According to the June 6, 2014 FIFA Rankings, the "Group of Death" included the 2nd ranked team in the world (Germany) and the 4th ranked team in the world (Portugal). In addition, the US had to face the team that knocked it out of each of the last two World Cups (Ghana, in the Round of 16 in 2010 and in the group stage in 2006). Most people said the good ole red, white and blue had no chance. In my World Cup pool (which I lost by a lot), I picked the US to advance out of the group stage. I am fairly certain that was more wishing than believing, but I did have some legitimate faith that we would advance.
One of the things rarely mentioned was that part of the reason the US was in the "Group of Death" was because of the US. Ignoring, for a moment, what happened at the World Cup, look at some of the options for the groups. The US was in a pot with the other CONCACAF teams and the teams from Asia. Mexico needed a miracle goal from the US simply to get into a play-off with New Zealand to qualify for the World Cup. Neither Costa Rica nor Honduras were expected to do much (and Honduras proved such expectations were correct.) None of the Asians teams looked all that impressive coming into (or out of) the World Cup. Whatever group the US went into was going to be a tough group, because the US was the strongest team in its pot. The fact that two top 5 teams and the strongest (arguably) African team also ended up in the group was just the icing on the cake.
Of course, the US did advance. We won a dramatic game against Ghana, fell to a gut-punch tie against Portugal, and lost a valiant 1-0 game to Germany. I watched all three games, as tense as a teenager taking a pregnancy test. The final game, when the score of Portugal-Ghana was arguably more important than the US-Germany game, was particularly tough. I watched the final game on tape delay by about an hour, which means I couldn't simulcast the Portugal-Ghana game. I almost blew it by trying to check the other game's score with about 20 minutes to go. Luckily I caught myself and didn't "reveal" anything to myself in those final 20 minutes.
The Round of 16 game was disappointing, to say the least. Although it is fun to say "Thibaut Cortois" and watching Julian Green come in and score was awesome, that game left a lot to be desired. Once it was over, and American fans could sit back and assess, the final question could be asked. Are we, as a soccer nation, advancing?
I have one friend who says clearly yes. I have several friends who generally say yes. I'm not so sure. We accomplished one thing we have never accomplished before, we advanced out of the group stage for the second time in a row. Other than that, I am trying to figure out how 2014 is any more promising than 2002.
In 2002, the 13th ranked US placed second in a group with South Korea (40), Portugal (5) and Poland (38). The US shocked Portugal, tied South Korea, then lost to Poland, but advanced when South Korea beat Portugal. The US then beat Mexico in the Round of 16, before losing a 1-0 game to eventual runner-up Germany, in large part due to the outstanding play of Oliver Kahn.
Exactly how is 2014 better than 2002? Yes, the 2014 group was harder than the 2002 group, but in both years, we won a tough game, tied a game, lost our last game and were ultimately knocked out by a superior European team. Arguably, that 2002 German team that made it to the finals was tougher than the 2014 Belgium team that lost their next game. In that sense, you could argue that we took a step back. That may be taking things too far, but it is hard to argue that we are moving forward, when we once again advanced, only to lose to one of the best of Europe.
You could argue that the future looks brighter than it did in 2002, but does it really? In 2002, 20 year olds Demarcus Beasley and Landon Donovan played significant roles. John O'Brien was 24, as was Clint Mathis. Tim Howard was just beginning to emerge from the shadows of Brad Friedel, Kasey Keller and Tony Meola. The US had proven they could play with the big boys and seemed to have a core of solid young players, ready to go to the next level.
What happened? 2006 happened. The US showed up and immediately got trounced by the Czech Republic, 3-0. They regrouped and earned a 1-1 tie with Italy, before losing to Ghana, when a win would have advanced us to the next round.
In 2010, like 2014, the US showed they are a middle of the pack World Cup team, by winning a weak group (thanks to a dramatic late game goal and a terrible miss by the England keeper) and losing in the Round of 16. Don't get me wrong, middle of the pack in the World Cup is somewhere between 10th and 20th out of about 200 countries. That's pretty good, but I don't see what we have done to make anyone think we are moving towards the big boys.
Here we are, 12 years later, and I see the same thing. A solid core of young players; a successful World Cup run; a coach who everyone believes in, ready to stick around for four more years and take us to the next level. Remember, in 2002, Bruce Arena was a soccer God. In 2006, US Soccer couldn't take his credentials away fast enough. Is that where Juergen Klinsmann is headed?
I don't mean to be Debbie Downer. Hopefully Julian Green is our Maradona. We have produced World class goalies at a rate even greater than England produces World Cup disappointments. Klinsmann's strategy of poaching from other countries, especially his home country, certainly paid off. There is room for optimism, but realistically, we look exactly like we did 12 years ago. If we get second in a tough group in 2026, and lose to a superior European squad, will US fans be satisfied? I won't, but I have no reason to expect more.
This World Cup was fantastic. The games were great, with upsets, drama, a biting. What more could you ask for? Even my boys enjoyed the games (Middle to such an extent that he started begging for a Neymar jersey). At the end of three weeks, though, we had four super-powers left standing: four time (now) champion Germany; five time champion, Brazil; two time champion, Argentina; and the best team to never win the World Cup, the Netherlands (why don't we call them Holland?) I enjoyed the tournament thoroughly. I just don't see us as equal to the big boys, yet.
Again, sorry for writing about this a month late. I started several weeks ago and worked on it a little from time to time. Next week I will cover Kill the Family Tour 2014 and you will see why I just couldn't finish.
The biggest story coming into the World Cup was preparedness. Would the Brazilians be ready for the Cup and would the people support the games or protest? This seems to be a lather, rinse, repeat story for both the World Cup and the Olympics over the last 10 or so years (potentially more, but memory, fading from age, destroyed by the Tour.) As typically happens, everything came together in time, and, as the Brits would say, the hosts put on a jolly good show.
Let's be honest, the people running these things and broadcasting them know what they are doing. Pick a place with beautiful scenery and point the cameras in the right direction. I know there were some protests, but media coverage was limited. Cameras were pointed at the games, the beautiful scenery, the unbelievable shots (like the floods before the US-Portugal game), the crazy fans, and the hot women. I saw about an equal number of crazy fans and hot women. I don't recall seeing a protest.
I read in the Washington Post a few weeks ago that this may be the last World Cup in a democratic nation. The article stated that people in democratic nations no longer want to spend their tax dollars on new stadiums when they need new schools and food. As support for this premise, the writer pointed out that Poland and Sweden dropped their bids for the 2022 Olympics because the people don't want them. This may have an element of truth to it, but I don't think it will play out. The next two World Cups are not (currently planned to be) in democracies, but somehow, I think the US will host this thing again. I also find it hard to believe that Germany, England, France, Brazil, Japan and/or South Korea will never want to host again. Even in democracies, the people in power find ways to do things the people don't want, especially if that gets their faces on television.
The second biggest story, at least here, was whether the US could advance from the "Group of Death." According to the June 6, 2014 FIFA Rankings, the "Group of Death" included the 2nd ranked team in the world (Germany) and the 4th ranked team in the world (Portugal). In addition, the US had to face the team that knocked it out of each of the last two World Cups (Ghana, in the Round of 16 in 2010 and in the group stage in 2006). Most people said the good ole red, white and blue had no chance. In my World Cup pool (which I lost by a lot), I picked the US to advance out of the group stage. I am fairly certain that was more wishing than believing, but I did have some legitimate faith that we would advance.
One of the things rarely mentioned was that part of the reason the US was in the "Group of Death" was because of the US. Ignoring, for a moment, what happened at the World Cup, look at some of the options for the groups. The US was in a pot with the other CONCACAF teams and the teams from Asia. Mexico needed a miracle goal from the US simply to get into a play-off with New Zealand to qualify for the World Cup. Neither Costa Rica nor Honduras were expected to do much (and Honduras proved such expectations were correct.) None of the Asians teams looked all that impressive coming into (or out of) the World Cup. Whatever group the US went into was going to be a tough group, because the US was the strongest team in its pot. The fact that two top 5 teams and the strongest (arguably) African team also ended up in the group was just the icing on the cake.
Of course, the US did advance. We won a dramatic game against Ghana, fell to a gut-punch tie against Portugal, and lost a valiant 1-0 game to Germany. I watched all three games, as tense as a teenager taking a pregnancy test. The final game, when the score of Portugal-Ghana was arguably more important than the US-Germany game, was particularly tough. I watched the final game on tape delay by about an hour, which means I couldn't simulcast the Portugal-Ghana game. I almost blew it by trying to check the other game's score with about 20 minutes to go. Luckily I caught myself and didn't "reveal" anything to myself in those final 20 minutes.
The Round of 16 game was disappointing, to say the least. Although it is fun to say "Thibaut Cortois" and watching Julian Green come in and score was awesome, that game left a lot to be desired. Once it was over, and American fans could sit back and assess, the final question could be asked. Are we, as a soccer nation, advancing?
I have one friend who says clearly yes. I have several friends who generally say yes. I'm not so sure. We accomplished one thing we have never accomplished before, we advanced out of the group stage for the second time in a row. Other than that, I am trying to figure out how 2014 is any more promising than 2002.
In 2002, the 13th ranked US placed second in a group with South Korea (40), Portugal (5) and Poland (38). The US shocked Portugal, tied South Korea, then lost to Poland, but advanced when South Korea beat Portugal. The US then beat Mexico in the Round of 16, before losing a 1-0 game to eventual runner-up Germany, in large part due to the outstanding play of Oliver Kahn.
Exactly how is 2014 better than 2002? Yes, the 2014 group was harder than the 2002 group, but in both years, we won a tough game, tied a game, lost our last game and were ultimately knocked out by a superior European team. Arguably, that 2002 German team that made it to the finals was tougher than the 2014 Belgium team that lost their next game. In that sense, you could argue that we took a step back. That may be taking things too far, but it is hard to argue that we are moving forward, when we once again advanced, only to lose to one of the best of Europe.
You could argue that the future looks brighter than it did in 2002, but does it really? In 2002, 20 year olds Demarcus Beasley and Landon Donovan played significant roles. John O'Brien was 24, as was Clint Mathis. Tim Howard was just beginning to emerge from the shadows of Brad Friedel, Kasey Keller and Tony Meola. The US had proven they could play with the big boys and seemed to have a core of solid young players, ready to go to the next level.
What happened? 2006 happened. The US showed up and immediately got trounced by the Czech Republic, 3-0. They regrouped and earned a 1-1 tie with Italy, before losing to Ghana, when a win would have advanced us to the next round.
In 2010, like 2014, the US showed they are a middle of the pack World Cup team, by winning a weak group (thanks to a dramatic late game goal and a terrible miss by the England keeper) and losing in the Round of 16. Don't get me wrong, middle of the pack in the World Cup is somewhere between 10th and 20th out of about 200 countries. That's pretty good, but I don't see what we have done to make anyone think we are moving towards the big boys.
Here we are, 12 years later, and I see the same thing. A solid core of young players; a successful World Cup run; a coach who everyone believes in, ready to stick around for four more years and take us to the next level. Remember, in 2002, Bruce Arena was a soccer God. In 2006, US Soccer couldn't take his credentials away fast enough. Is that where Juergen Klinsmann is headed?
I don't mean to be Debbie Downer. Hopefully Julian Green is our Maradona. We have produced World class goalies at a rate even greater than England produces World Cup disappointments. Klinsmann's strategy of poaching from other countries, especially his home country, certainly paid off. There is room for optimism, but realistically, we look exactly like we did 12 years ago. If we get second in a tough group in 2026, and lose to a superior European squad, will US fans be satisfied? I won't, but I have no reason to expect more.
This World Cup was fantastic. The games were great, with upsets, drama, a biting. What more could you ask for? Even my boys enjoyed the games (Middle to such an extent that he started begging for a Neymar jersey). At the end of three weeks, though, we had four super-powers left standing: four time (now) champion Germany; five time champion, Brazil; two time champion, Argentina; and the best team to never win the World Cup, the Netherlands (why don't we call them Holland?) I enjoyed the tournament thoroughly. I just don't see us as equal to the big boys, yet.
Again, sorry for writing about this a month late. I started several weeks ago and worked on it a little from time to time. Next week I will cover Kill the Family Tour 2014 and you will see why I just couldn't finish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)